: through 및 : source 옵션을 통해 두 개의 유사한 다형성 연결을 사용하여 SQL 검색을 수행하려고합니다. 내가보고있는 것은 레일이 첫 번째 "has_many : reservation_trip_itinerary_entries ..."에 대한 테이블 이름 별칭을 남기고 있다는 것입니다.레일즈 : 조인에서 적절한 테이블 별명을 포함하지 않는 다형성 연관?
보너스 질문 : 연관성을 반환하지만 되돌릴 새로운 제휴 또는 별칭을 만들 수 있습니까? 백업 파일이 비어 있다면? 아마도 그것은 또 다른 질문의 가치가있을 것입니다.
class Reservation < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :reservation_trips, :order => :departure_date, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :trip_types, :through => :reservation_trips # contact booking report
has_many :reservation_trip_itinerary_entries, :through => :reservation_trips, :source => :itinerary_entries
has_many :trip_type_itinerary_entries, :through => :trip_types, :source => :itinerary_entries
# excluded irrelevant methods
def search
# many other search params excluded, all populating 'includes' and
# 'warez' in the same way
if params.key?(:itinerary_entry) and not params[:itinerary_entry].empty?
includes.push(:reservation_trip_itinerary_entries)
includes.push(:trip_type_itinerary_entries)
warez.push("(
(reservation_trip_itinerary_entries.action_type = '#{params[:itinerary_entry][:action_type]}' AND
reservation_trip_itinerary_entries.action_id = #{params[:itinerary_entry][:action_id]})
OR
(trip_type_itinerary_entries.action_type = '#{params[:itinerary_entry][:action_type]}' AND
trip_type_itinerary_entries.action_id = #{params[:itinerary_entry][:action_id]})
)")
end
Reservation.includes(includes).where(warez.join(' AND ')).order('reservations.created_at DESC').limit(params[:limit])
end
: 여기
class ItineraryEntry < ActiveRecord::Base
default_scope order('position ASC')
attr_accessible :title, :code, :datetime, :position, :itinerary_type, :itinerary_id, :action_type, :action_id
belongs_to :itinerary, polymorphic: true
belongs_to :action, polymorphic: true
가 (많은 ItineraryEntries에 상위) 예약이다 : 여기
는 (각각 별도의리스트를 포함 모두 TripType 지점 ReservationTrip 통해 예약에 자식)를 일정 항목이며
그리고 오류가 발생하는 SQL이 생성됩니다.
PG::Error: ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table "reservation_trip_itinerary_entries"
LINE 2: (reservation_trip_itinerary_entries.action_type = ...
^
생각 :
여기SELECT DISTINCT "reservations".id,
reservations.created_at AS alias_0
FROM "reservations"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "reservation_trips" ON "reservation_trips"."reservation_id" = "reservations"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "itinerary_entries" ON "itinerary_entries"."itinerary_id" = "reservation_trips"."id"
AND "itinerary_entries"."itinerary_type" = 'ReservationTrip'
LEFT OUTER JOIN "reservation_trips" "reservation_trips_reservations_join" ON "reservation_trips_reservations_join"."reservation_id" = "reservations"."id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "trip_types" ON "trip_types"."id" = "reservation_trips_reservations_join"."trip_type_id"
LEFT OUTER JOIN "itinerary_entries" "trip_type_itinerary_entries_reservations" ON "trip_type_itinerary_entries_reservations"."itinerary_id" = "trip_types"."id"
AND "trip_type_itinerary_entries_reservations"."itinerary_type" = 'TripType'
WHERE (((reservation_trip_itinerary_entries.action_type = 'Activity'
AND reservation_trip_itinerary_entries.action_id = 3)
OR (trip_type_itinerary_entries.action_type = 'Activity'
AND trip_type_itinerary_entries.action_id = 3)))
ORDER BY reservations.created_at DESC LIMIT 100
는 SQL 오류입니다 : 두 번째 ("trip_type_itinerary_entries_reservations")을 수행하는 동안 "itinerary_entries"의 첫 번째 목록은 별칭이없는 방법에 주목? 감사!